Pinhole Versus Tunnel for Soft Tissue Recession
Purpose
This is an assessor-blinded split-mouth randomized clinical study to compare root coverage and gingival tissue thickness following two different surgical procedures for non-autologous grafting: the pinhole surgical technique (PST) and tunnel technique.
Condition
- Gingival Recession
Eligibility
- Eligible Ages
- Between 18 Years and 75 Years
- Eligible Genders
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- between 18-75 years old - have at least one non-mobile tooth with Cairo class I gingival recession of 2 to 6 mm. - American Society of Anesthesiology class I and II - full mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) below 20%
Exclusion Criteria
- sites of gingival recession around teeth that are non-salvageable - presence of any exudate, infection or local inflammation around the area to be grafted - pregnant or breastfeeding females
Study Design
- Phase
- N/A
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- N/A
- Intervention Model
- Single Group Assignment
- Intervention Model Description
- Right and left sides of the mouth will be randomly assigned to test and control group by computer generated randomization table in a split mouth design
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- None (Open Label)
- Masking Description
- PI and statistician will be blinded to the type of investigation for
Arm Groups
Arm | Description | Assigned Intervention |
---|---|---|
Experimental Pinhole/Tunnel |
Participants will receive Pinhole surgical technique for treatment of soft tissue recession at one side of the mouth and Tunnel technique for treatment of soft tissue recession at the other side of the mouth |
|
Recruiting Locations
UK Center for Clinical and Translational Science and nearby locations
Lexington, Kentucky 40536
Mohanad Al-Sabbagh, BDS (DDS)
859-257-3003
More Details
- NCT ID
- NCT04513041
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Mohanad Al-Sabbagh
Detailed Description
Each patient will undergo both surgeries on either quadrant; the PST and tunnel technique. The site will be randomized to receive either type of surgeries. Both types of surgeries are considered minimally invasive procedures to obtain root coverage for gingival recession. Both surgeries are clinically utilized in clinical practice and yield comparable results according to the literature, however, No prospective studies are published to compare between the outcomes of both techniques. patients will receive intra oral scan before the surgery and 6 months after the surgery to compare change in root coverage and gingival thickness outcomes between the two techniques. Post operative pain as well as patient satisfaction will be measured by visual analog scale and compared between the two techniques. Patients will be monitored at different time points to asses healing.